Re: Announcing the release of BLCR 0.6.0_beta1

From: Paul H. Hargrove (PHHargrove_at_lbl_dot_gov)
Date: Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:26:51 PDT

  • Next message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Announcing the release of BLCR 0.6.0_beta2"
    Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
    > Neal Becker wrote:
    [snip]
    >>
    >> Building srpm on fedora f7 x86_64:
    >>
    >> configure: >>>> BEGIN sub-configure for 32-bit libs >>>>
    >> configure: /home/nbecker/RPM/BUILD/blcr-0.6.0_b1/configure
    >> '--srcdir=/home/nbecker/RPM/BUILD/blcr-0.6.0_b1' '--build=i686-linux'
    >> '--libdir=/usr/lib' --with-components=libcr,tests,examples
    >> '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr' '--exec-prefix=/usr'
    >> '--bindir=/usr/bin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' '--sysconfdir=/etc'
    >> '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/include'
    >> '--libexecdir=/usr/libexec' '--localstatedir=/var'
    >> '--sharedstatedir=/usr/com' '--mandir=/usr/share/man'
    >> '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--disable-config-report' 'FFLAGS=-O2 -g
    >> -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
    >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe
    >> -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
    >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mtune=generic' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall
    >> -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
    >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mtune=generic' 'CC=gcc -m32' 'CXX=g++ -m32'
    >> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
    >> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
    >> checking for gawk... gawk
    >> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
    >> configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make
    >> distclean" there first
    >> configure: error: --enable-multilib requested but FAILED sub-configure
    >> for 32-bit libs
    >> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
    >> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm/rpm-tmp.92347 (%build)
    [snip]
    
    I have a fix that seems to work OK, but I can't fully test it yet.
    However, I've found that there is an unrelated problem in how the SRPM I
    posted was built that prevents building from it on a 32-bit platform.
    
    There will, I hope, be a 0.6.0_b2 later today with both fixes for both
    the SRPM problem(s) and the 1-line configure patch from Cedric.
    However, I am not certain about resolving the problems Cedric saw at
    insmod-time.
    
    -Paul
    
    -- 
    Paul H. Hargrove                          PHHargrove_at_lbl_dot_gov
    Future Technologies Group
    HPC Research Department                   Tel: +1-510-495-2352
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
    

  • Next message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Announcing the release of BLCR 0.6.0_beta2"