From: John Hodrien (johnh_at_comp.leeds.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 30 2007 - 08:19:33 PDT
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > Yes, your version is what I had intended. Thanks much for the proof > reading. By "seems to work nicely" do you mean that with this patch > (suitable modified) you can load the module *and* have successfully run > tests (e.g. "make check")? If you can confirm that you pass the tests, > I'll roll the patch into 0.6.0. The machine I was testing it on is a short walk from where I am now, and appears to have been broken by someone. I'd just performed a basic ad-hoc test and all was well, but I'll rerun with make check too and get back to you. I'll be off for a walk ;) Thanks, jh -- "The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is 'What does a woman want?'." -- Sigmund Freud